Third of Kiwis see content on social media that directly encourages violence – report
The report found that 83% of people were concerned about harmful or inappropriate content on social media, video-sharing sites or other websites.
Ablett-Hampson said the survey data showed a “significant shift” between people’s ability to choose which “regulated media”, like TV shows and movies, were consumed and the challenges of preventing abuse. exposure to damage by other means.
“I thought it was telling that 33% of people have seen content that directly promotes or encourages violence towards others on topics like race, culture, religion and sexuality,” he said. .
Similarly, 20% of survey respondents had seen online content encouraging self-harming behaviors.
The research came at the right time because the government had commissioned a review of online media and content regulation, Ablett-Hampson said.
He said he aimed to design and implement a new approach to content regulation that minimizes the risk of harm to New Zealanders.
“People have told us that there is a lot to do to improve things including tighter regulation, better technical solutions, education and tech/social media companies to take more responsibility and we hope that this information will help inform the government’s review.”
Ablett-Hampson said the report was more aimed at children and young people “because that’s the goal” of the Classification Office.
However, he “completely” agreed that all New Zealanders were vulnerable to exposure to harmful content.
“I think a lot of the misinformation that has led to Covid hesitation and protests in Parliament…is directly due to material being brought into New Zealand via social media platforms.”
Online damage was “particularly widespread” in New Zealand, with “really direct experiences”, he said, which included things like the March 15 mosque attacks.
On Tuesday, Ablett-Hampson banned a pseudo-documentary using extensive footage from a live stream of the attacks, which also had a voiceover claiming the attacks were fabricated.
In an interim decision, he classified it as objectionable content and it is an offense for anyone to download, view or share it.
The 33-minute video served as the second part of a play that was banned in February.
A final decision on banning the content will be made within 20 days.