Media platforms

European Parliament and social media platforms

On November 8, the European Parliament’s Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee held a public hearing in which whistleblower Frances Haugen was invited to testify on the negative impact of social media products on the users.

Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) asked her several questions about the harmful technical practices of social media platforms and she explained to them how social media platforms collect private data, use it for commercial purposes and how Facebook continues to grow. ‘engage people on the platform, and why. She also spoke about the negative impact of social media platforms on young people and how we can save young people from negative impacts. Instagram’s negative impact was the major issue for Members of the European Parliament, so they raised several questions about Instagram-related suicides among young people and vulnerable people.

After his briefing, there was a question-and-answer session. I attended both online sessions to understand the topic of online security and its priority for the European population, the rapidly changing online world and how to ensure a better and safer digital environment for internet users.

MEP Christel Schaldemose (SD, Denmark), who leads MEPs for the Digital Services Act (DSA), was of the opinion that all Facebook users should know and understand to the greatest extent the business model and the choices behind how the platform works while Andreas Schwab (EPP, Germany) reported that Facebook plays (plays) an important role in modern society and shows users political ads and political content based on our personal data, and this practice can create “echo chambers”.

European politicians firmly believe that there is an urgent need to regulate online political content and the social media platform (Facebook) should use user data with informed user consent, and the mechanism behind the algorithm. should be shared with users so that they can know the risk that any algorithm or algorithm change poses to users and hold platforms responsible for the negative impact of recommended systems and algorithms.

This public hearing indicates that European politicians and political parties feel threatened by a new type of “perception-building” against political systems and democracies. I think the most vulnerable are the democracies in developing countries where they are already facing pressure from institutions and powerful corporate giants, and it is understandable that institutions and corporate giants can use the platforms of social media for “diet change” without coming to the fore. We understand that a “game of deception with deceptive tools” is being played against many countries, against several political parties and against a number of individuals through social media campaigns in South Asia.

It is relevant to mention that the European Parliament is working on the development of the “Digital Markets Act” (DMA) to guarantee the privacy of users so that personal data can only be used for political advertising purposes if users give their consent. renewed consent.

According to the committee bureau of the European Parliament, “digital transformation is one of the EU’s priorities and the Parliament is helping to shape policies that will strengthen Europe’s capacities in new digital technologies, open up new opportunities for businesses and consumers and that is why the European Parliament adopted in May 2021 a report on shaping Europe’s digital future. The EU is investing € 7.6 billion in five areas: supercomputing (€ 2.2 billion), artificial intelligence (€ 2.1 billion), cybersecurity (€ 1.6 billion), skills digital technologies (0.6 billion euros) and ensure wide use of digital technologies in the economy and society (1.1 billion euros). Therefore, online security, transparency of algorithms and risk mitigation are important issues for Europe.

The important points shared with Members of the European Parliament during his testimony are as follows:

  • One in three social media users is under 18.
  • Instagram users are scared – I can’t stop – I will be cut off from my family and friends if I stop using it.
  • We really need a system instead of blaming parents.
  • Parents sometimes want to occupy their children and ask them to use social media.
  • Facebook discourages research into the impact of social media on children and the development of meaningful social interactions.
  • Data collected by Facebook must be shared with the public on an ongoing basis and data monitoring is required
  • Hate speech is also considered a social media interaction
  • Producing more content is Facebook’s game and it is done by creating contradictions and encouraging contradictions, including hate speech.
  • Negative comments are encouraged and radicalization is also seen as a “debate”
  • We don’t know what’s really going to happen with the data we share with social media platforms?
  • It is the responsibility of social media platforms to educate people about the impact of social media, but the evaluation process has been halted in Facebook operations.
  • Data streaming should be released on a monthly basis.
  • There should be a centralized authority in Europe to keep an eye out for fake news and disinformation.
  • The US and EU approaches are different when it comes to privacy and morals, while a majority of social media platforms are registered in the US and follow US rules and ethics.
  • Facebook hides people impact data because Facebook knows that if the data is shared with users, they would avoid accessing it (Facebook).
  • Tracking people is a forced option without their knowledge.
  • Creating “hatred and division” among social groups is the deadly game of social media platforms.
  • Whistleblowers are important and they are protected by US rules.
  • Ghost profiles are on social media to engage people.
  • Instagram and Facebook provide misinformation and the most vulnerable are those who are already in a phase of loneliness such as divorced people, single people, etc.
  • You are invited to groups, but leaving a group does not mean that your data has not been shared and collected by a new group that you join, even for a minute.
  • Facebook’s algorithm is tricky and the EU has a big role to play in discussing these issues because it is a real democracy.
  • Social media platforms should indicate what backend system they have for security and data collection.
  • End-to-End Encryption: Facebook doesn’t share the type of encryption it has. People would be shocked one day if Facebook leaked it.

This public hearing indicates that European politicians and political parties feel threatened by a new type of “perception-building” against political systems and democracies. I believe that the most vulnerable are the democracies of developing countries where they already face pressures from institutions and powerful corporate giants, and it is understandable that institutions and corporate giants can use the platforms of social media for “diet change” without coming to the fore. We understand that a “game of deception with deceptive tools” is being played against many countries, against several political parties and against a number of individuals through social media campaigns in South Asia.


Source link

LEAVE A RESPONSE

Your email address will not be published.